UNSILENCED.
EN
III·cAtrocity — Deep Dive

The Herero & Nama Genocide

1904–1908. The German Imperial Army wrote down the order: extermination. Historians treat it as the template for what the twentieth century would do next.

Herero and Nama prisoners in chains, German South-West Africa, c.1905
Surviving Herero and Nama, chained, awaiting transport to the concentration camps of Shark Island and Swakopmund.Source — Bundesarchiv / Wikimedia Commons

In short

Was the Herero and Nama killing a genocide?

Yes. Germany's 1904 extermination order against the Herero, and the campaign that followed against the Nama, killed an estimated 80% of the Herero and 50% of the Nama — about 65,000 and 10,000 people. Survivors were held in Konzentrationslager on Shark Island and elsewhere. Germany formally recognised the killings as genocide in 2021.

On 2 October 1904, General Lothar von Trotha addressed the Herero people: "Within the German borders every Herero, with or without a rifle, with or without cattle, will be shot." This sentence is in the German military archives[5].

Duration
1904 – 1908
Territory
German South-West Africa (today Namibia)
Sovereign
Kaiser Wilhelm II
Commander
Lt-Gen Lothar von Trotha
Herero killed
≈65,000 (≈80% of population)
Nama killed
≈10,000 (≈50% of population)

How it began

The Herero uprising of January 1904

German colonisation of South-West Africa from 1884 took Herero land, cattle, water sources, and women. The Herero, led by paramount chief Samuel Maharero, rose against German settlers in January 1904. They killed around 123 German civilians. They explicitly spared women, children, missionaries, English-speaking traders, and the Boers.

Berlin's response was disproportionate even by the standards of colonial warfare. Trotha was dispatched with 14,000 troops and explicit instructions to "destroy" rather than negotiate.

The Vernichtungsbefehl

The extermination order

At the Battle of Waterberg in August 1904 Trotha encircled the Herero on three sides and left the fourth — eastwards into the Omaheke desert — deliberately open. He drove the survivors into it. His soldiers were ordered to poison the waterholes and to shoot any Herero who attempted to return.

“The Herero people must leave this land. If they do not, I will force them with the Groot Rohr (cannon). Within the German borders every Herero, with or without a rifle, with or without cattle, will be shot. I no longer accept women and children.”
Lt-Gen Lothar von Trotha · Vernichtungsbefehl (Extermination Order), 2 October 1904
The Omaheke — death by enforced thirst
Herero survivors who escaped through the Omaheke desert, photographed after the German pursuit was called off. Wells along the escape route had been poisoned on General von Trotha's orders.Source — Bundesarchiv / Wikimedia Commons

The camps

Shark Island, Swakopmund, the Lüderitz works

When the policy of starvation in the Omaheke became internationally embarrassing, Berlin ordered the survivors interned in concentration camps. The largest, on Shark Island in Lüderitz Bay, had a mortality rate above 60%. Survivors worked the harbour, railways, and German settler farms — many in chains.

Medical experimentation on prisoners — including by Eugen Fischer, later a leading Nazi racial theorist — produced the racial-science research that would be cited in Mein Kampf and built into the Nuremberg laws[10].

The through-line

What this had to do with what came after

Historians Jürgen Zimmerer, Benjamin Madley and others have traced what they call the "colonial-genocide continuum" from German South-West Africa to the Holocaust: shared personnel (Hermann Göring's father was governor of South-West Africa; Eugen Fischer trained Josef Mengele), shared techniques (concentration camps, racial classification, extermination orders), shared bureaucratic templates[10].

The argument is not that the Holocaust was a colonial event — it is that the Holocaust did not arrive without precedent. The precedent was practised on Africans first.

Casualty math

How the 75,000 figure is built

Chronology

Key dates

  1. 1884

    Germany annexes South-West Africa.

  2. 1903 Oct

    Nama Bondelswarts uprising — initial revolt.

  3. 1904 Jan

    Herero rise under Samuel Maharero.

  4. 1904 Aug

    Battle of Waterberg — Herero driven into the Omaheke desert.

  5. 1904 Oct

    Trotha issues the Vernichtungsbefehl.

  6. 1905

    Nama rise under Hendrik Witbooi. Extermination order extended.

  7. 1905–07

    Concentration camps at Shark Island, Swakopmund, Karibib, Windhoek.

  8. 1908

    Camps closed. Surviving Herero and Nama assigned to forced labour on settler farms.

  9. 1948

    South African Blue Book on the genocide is recalled and pulped under apartheid government pressure.

  10. 2021

    Germany formally recognises the genocide; pledges €1.1bn over 30 years. Herero and Nama groups reject the deal.

In short

Why is the Herero and Nama genocide called the first genocide of the twentieth century?

Because it was ordered in writing, executed by a European state army, and completed in camps. On 2 October 1904 Lieutenant-General Lothar von Trotha issued an extermination order (Vernichtungsbefehl) instructing German troops to shoot every Herero found inside the colony, with or without a weapon. Survivors driven into the Omaheke desert were denied the waterholes. Those who came back were put into Konzentrationslager, where roughly half died.

Between 1904 and 1908 an estimated 65,000 of 80,000 Herero and 10,000 of 20,000 Nama were killed — around 80% and 50% of each people. Germany formally recognised the events as genocide in 2021.

The ledger

The four stages of the extermination

StageWhat was doneOutcome
Jan–Aug 1904Uprising against land seizures and settler violence; German reinforcements shipped inHerero encircled at Waterberg
Waterberg, Aug 1904Deliberate gap left in the encirclement toward the OmahekeCivilians pushed into waterless desert
Oct 1904Von Trotha's extermination order; waterholes poisoned or guardedMass death by thirst and shooting
1905–1908Camps at Shark Island, Swakopmund, Windhoek; forced labour≈45% mortality inside the camps
After 1908Herero land and cattle transferred to settlers; pass laws imposedA people dispossessed, not merely defeated

Figures from the German Reich's own colonial statistics and the 1918 Blue Book.

Mechanism

The desert as a weapon

The Battle of Waterberg in August 1904 is often written up as a military engagement. It was designed as a filter. German forces surrounded the Herero on three sides and left the fourth — the route into the Omaheke sandveld — open. Patrols then held the waterholes on the desert margin. Fleeing families walked until they died; German officers recorded the trail of bodies without ambiguity about what had produced it.

This matters legally as well as morally. Killing by engineered environment is still killing, and the intent is legible in the orders, the troop dispositions and the after-action reports. There is no version of the record in which the deaths were an accident of war.

The camps

Shark Island

Shark Island, off Lüderitz, was a peninsula of rock swept by cold Atlantic wind, where prisoners slept without shelter on rations that guaranteed decline. Mortality figures kept by the German administration itself run above 50% for some cohorts. Prisoners were leased to private companies to build the railway; medical officers conducted racial-anthropological measurements and shipped skulls to German universities.

Some of those skulls were only repatriated to Namibia between 2011 and 2018. The camp system links this colonial genocide to the later German record not by rhetorical analogy but through shared personnel, shared racial science and shared administrative vocabulary.

Aftermath

Recognition without reparations

In 2021 Germany officially named the killings a genocide and pledged €1.1 billion in development aid over 30 years. It refused to call the money reparations, and negotiated the agreement with the Namibian state rather than with Herero and Nama traditional authorities, who rejected it as settling their claim without them.

The dispute is therefore not about facts. It is about who has standing to accept an apology, and whether aid budgets can discharge a legal obligation.

FAQ

Frequently asked

How many Herero and Nama were killed?
Around 65,000 of roughly 80,000 Herero and about 10,000 of 20,000 Nama died between 1904 and 1908 — approximately 80% and 50% of each population.
Was there a written order to exterminate?
Yes. Lothar von Trotha's proclamation of 2 October 1904 ordered that every Herero found within German territory be shot, armed or unarmed, with or without cattle.
Has Germany apologised?
Germany recognised the genocide in 2021 and offered €1.1 billion in aid over 30 years, but declined to term it reparations. Herero and Nama representative bodies rejected the deal for excluding them from negotiations.
What happened to the victims' remains?
Skulls and skeletons were shipped to German universities and museums for racial research. Partial repatriations to Namibia took place in 2011, 2014 and 2018.

From the Archive

Herero survivors 1907
Herero survivors of the 1904 German extermination order, present-day Namibia.Source — Wikimedia Commons · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
Herero prisoners in chains
Herero prisoners chained by German colonial forces, 1907. The methods were studied by later European militarists.Source — Wikimedia Commons · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons

Last updated 23 June 2026Submit a correctionMethodology

References

Sources — Herero & Nama Genocide

  1. [1]Adam Hochschild, King Leopold's Ghost (Houghton Mifflin, 1998).
  2. [2]Roger Casement, "Report on the Administration of the Independent State of the Congo" (House of Commons, 1904).
  3. [3]Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World (Verso, 2001).
  4. [4]Madhusree Mukerjee, Churchill's Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II (Basic Books, 2010).
  5. [5]Jürgen Zimmerer & Joachim Zeller (eds.), Genocide in German South-West Africa (Merlin, 2008).
  6. [6]Caroline Elkins, Imperial Reckoning (Henry Holt, 2005), on the Kenyan detention camps.
  7. [7]Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States (Beacon, 2014).
  8. [8]Ann Curthoys, "Genocide in Tasmania: the history of an idea", in A. Dirk Moses (ed.), Empire, Colony, Genocide (Berghahn, 2008).
  9. [9]Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited (Cambridge University Press, 2004); Ilan Pappé, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Oneworld, 2006).
  10. [10]Geoffrey Robinson, The Killing Season: A History of the Indonesian Massacres, 1965–66 (Princeton, 2018).

All works cited in good faith for documentary, educational and critical use. Errors and omissions: contact the archive.